world19News
This e-mail is going to people on the mailing list for
world19. If you don't want to receive further notices, please reply to this e-mail with
"remove" in the subject. Let us know if you prefer to receive this in
"plain text" format.
Please forward this to anyone you think may be interested.
We always encourage people to send us comments, ideas, as well as information
about events or issues affecting our community.
Past newsletters are posted at www.newsletters.world19.com
In this issue:
1. world19 Garden Party
2. City of Toronto Act - Public Consultations
3. Community Health Centres:
4. Mayor to speak on new deal
5. Valumart/Southport
1. WORLD19 GARDEN PARTY
We've been busy trying to schedule the
week's rain to all occur before the weekend to ensure our usual
good weather for our subscribers' Garden Party this Saturday. (But it
will still go on rain or shine)
We hope a lot of you can make it. If you
think you can attend, and haven't yet let us know, we'd appreciate an
RSVP note so we can plan for refreshments.
And if you somehow missed the details
(emailed on June 7), we can send the invitation again.
2. CITY OF TORONTO ACT
We have written previously on the current
City/Provincial negotiations regarding the new City of Toronto Act (and
have written frequently on urban issues over the years).
Few people could be unaware of the struggles
Toronto (and many other large Canadian cities) face. Toronto in
particular has never recovered from the twin blows of amalgamation and
downloading (so we now must pay for much of the cost of social services
out of a property tax base).
There are many serious financial issues that
cannot be resolved by a few cents of gas tax money. Cities need
significantly more governance power so they do not have to run to the
province for approval for trivial issues. However, there is a lot of
concern that the province may attempt to impose a new governance
structure (didn't we learn anything from the imposed Megacity?).
We don't have the time or space here to go
into any depth on the issue; we assume most readers are aware of the
challenges. With the province committed to opening up and re-writing the
City of Toronto Act, this is truly an opportunity to build a
stronger & healthier Toronto -- and therefore a better City to
live in.
Until now, discussions on the Act have been
held privately between the City and Province, with little publicity, or
opportunity for public education and input. Next week, the City and
Province are organizing public consultations to be held on Wed. June 22.
This is your opportunity to participate in the future direction -- and
quite possibly the viability -- of the City of Toronto.
From a City notice:
"This is a rare opportunity to determine
Toronto's fate, and your voice should be heard. Bring your ideas,
questions, and input to a major public consultation on the new Act. Be
informed, engaged, and vocal.
Join Mayor Miller and John Gerretsen, Minister of Municipal Affairs and
Housing, at the Strong Toronto, Strong Ontario public consultation on
Wednesday, June 22, 2005 from 7:00 to 10:00 p.m. at one of the locations
set out below. (The five sites will be linked through video
conferencing)."
(We're only listing the 2 locations closest
to this area. See the City link below for all locations)
St. Lawrence Market - North
Front St. & Jarvis St. (northwest corner)
Etobicoke Collegiate
86 Montgomery Rd. (north of Bloor St.)
Please register for the consultation by calling Access Toronto at
416-338-0338. TTY Line 416-338-0889. Registration phone lines are open
weekdays, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Here are a few links providing some good
information on some of these issues.
a) City of Toronto
Notice of consultations, and several
relevant links
b) Toronto Act Now Coalition
- A group of many city organizations.
"The City of Toronto Act has to give Toronto
what it needs to build a City that works. This means that the new Act
must ensure that Toronto has three things: the power to build the City
Torontonians want, the resources to do the job, and a fair and
accountable government structure that works for all of us"
Both of the following links open PDF
documents:
"A City of Toronto Act that works for the
people of Toronto" (1 page)
Background document (3 pages) discussing
issues of accountable government, providing fiscal resources, and
governance structure
c) Direct City Action
An initiative started by former Mayor John
Sewell
The group's latest bulletin provides some
background and ideas relevant to the public discussions:
d) world19: a page on
our website that is a bit dated, but has several useful links:
3. COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRES
We received a note today from a long-time
subscriber from the Four Villages Community Health Centre. She pointed
out an editorial page article in Monday's Globe & Mail written
by Dr. Michael Rachlis in response to the controversy engendered by last
week's Supreme Court decision regarding private medical insurance.
The article was entitled "Community
health centres are medicare's best kept secret".
A couple of excerpts:
"Most medicare debates... focus on
timely access to surgical procedures for which there are long
waiting lists. But were we to strengthen care at an earlier stage in
the medical continuum, it would go a long way to resolving that
issue. Besides, our existing system is more flexible than its
critics charge; it already accommodates stand-alone clinics for
primary care or specialized services....
Mr. Copeman's [the Vancouver
business man who recently announced plans to open Canada's first
private health care centre] publicity implies that his clinic would
be the first in Canada to provide comprehensive, interdisciplinary
primary health care. Not so: Public-sector models have operated
below our media radar for decades. Canada's first community health
centre, Mount Carmel clinic, opened nearly 80 years ago in Winnipeg.
There are more than 250 such clinics now, most operated by local
citizen boards. Increasingly, regional health authorities are
establishing their own community health centres (CHCs), especially
in high-needs areas.
Thirty years ago, evaluations of
Ontario and Saskatchewan CHCs showed that they had lower per patient
costs. CHCs typically spend more on their ambulatory care, but
achieve lower institutional costs resulting in overall cost
savings."
The full article is on the Globe
website, but is only available to paid website subscribers.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?U6E61534B. Our reader points out that,
"The Four Villages Community Health Centre is exactly the type of clinic
Dr. Rachlis is talking about, and the centre is right here in the west
end of Toronto. We offer 24/7 care, work in an interdisciplinary team
that improves coordination and comprehensiveness of care, are cost
effective, prevent hospitalizations and excel in not only chronic
disease management, but also in prevention of illnesses."
The Canadian Alliance of Health Community
Health Centre Associations yesterday also issued a Press Release in
reaction to the Supreme Court decision, and other recent developments.
It pointed out alternatives to the creation of two-tiered health care as
a solution to problems the Canadian health system, and echoed Rachlis's
comments.
Excerpted from that press release:
CACHCA Chairperson, Jack McCarthy
... pointed out that it is more critical now than ever for the
legitimate frustrations of Canadians to be heard. He described this
as an opportunity and, he stated, "I would also like to think that
this surge of interest in alternative solutions to common
frustrations signals an opportunity. Policy makers across the
country face a very sobering reality and it is incumbent upon them
to engage partners at federal, provincial, and local levels to
explore strategies that will enhance the public system. It is a wake
up call."...
"Community health centres
across the country have proven themselves an important lever in
increasing the cost-effectiveness and smooth functioning of the
overall health system. This is precisely the sort of solution that
governments must focus in on. The solution is there, it just needs
to be taken up."
Governed by the communities in which they are situated, McCarthy
noted that the core strength of the CHC model is that comprehensive,
non-profit, primary health care, including health promotion and
illness prevention programs, is delivered by multi-disciplinary
teams of health care professionals. These teams, including
physicians, nurse practitioners,
nurses, chiropodists, dieticians, social workers and other
professionals, ensure a full continuum of care where clients receive
the right care, by the right provider, at the right time. Patients
are kept healthy, communities are enriched, and the time and
expertise of distinct health care providers are most effectively and
efficiently utilized.
"The public solutions are there. In the area of primary health care
we know them as CHCs. Other critical public solutions exist in the
area of acute care. Whether they will be seized upon is one
question. Whether policy makers wish to be remembered as those who
sat by while Medicare languished, or as those who rose to embrace
and implement these solutions that are already there before their
very eyes, is another."
4. MAYOR TO
SPEAK ON NEW DEAL - Jun. 20
In our newsletter last night which talked about the new City of Toronto Act,
and the importance or public participation, we
neglected to remind readers that the Bloor West
Village Residents Association will be holding a public
meeting on Monday featuring Mayor David Miller speaking on "The New
Deal for Toronto".
Runnymede United Church
Mon. Jun 20, 7pm
See www.bwvra.ca for more details.
See also the June 15 Toronto Star column by
Royson James on the New Deal, the new Act, and the need for public (and
politicians') involvement:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L2715444B
5. VALUMART / SOUTHPORT
When the developer of the new condo development to be built on the Southport
Plaza site (Georgian Homes) began the process, they indicated that the
major existing retail facilities -- in particular the only grocery
store in
the area (ValuMart) -- would remain open unti new
retail space was built.
However, word has come that not only will the
ValuMart close at the end of this month, upsetting the many neighbouring
residents who depend on it, but it seems it was
the developer that bought out the ValuMart lease. According
to one reader who has been investigating this, the developer wasn't
obliged to keep the retail operating, but was required to allow retail to
continue. Odd way to do
that...
[Addendum: In fact, the
OMB decision approving the development included the condition that the new
retail facilities must be built before the residential, in order to preserve
the retail services]
For world19,
John Leeson
world19:
Supporting citizen involvement in our community and its future.
Phone: 416 766-8605
email: world19@world19.com
web: www.world19.com |